You.
Chels
Gill

Me.
Flickr
Last FM

Old.
10/2003 - 11/2003
11/2003 - 12/2003
12/2003 - 01/2004
01/2004 - 02/2004
02/2004 - 03/2004
03/2004 - 04/2004
04/2004 - 05/2004
05/2004 - 06/2004
06/2004 - 07/2004
07/2004 - 08/2004
08/2004 - 09/2004
09/2004 - 10/2004
10/2004 - 11/2004
11/2004 - 12/2004
12/2004 - 01/2005
01/2005 - 02/2005
02/2005 - 03/2005
03/2005 - 04/2005
04/2005 - 05/2005
05/2005 - 06/2005
06/2005 - 07/2005
07/2005 - 08/2005
08/2005 - 09/2005
09/2005 - 10/2005
10/2005 - 11/2005
11/2005 - 12/2005
12/2005 - 01/2006
01/2006 - 02/2006
02/2006 - 03/2006
03/2006 - 04/2006
05/2006 - 06/2006
06/2006 - 07/2006
07/2006 - 08/2006
08/2006 - 09/2006
09/2006 - 10/2006
10/2006 - 11/2006
11/2006 - 12/2006
12/2006 - 01/2007
01/2007 - 02/2007
02/2007 - 03/2007
03/2007 - 04/2007
04/2007 - 05/2007
07/2007 - 08/2007
09/2007 - 10/2007
03/2008 - 04/2008
04/2008 - 05/2008
05/2008 - 06/2008
06/2008 - 07/2008
07/2008 - 08/2008
08/2008 - 09/2008
09/2008 - 10/2008
10/2008 - 11/2008
11/2008 - 12/2008
10/2009 - 11/2009
09/2011 - 10/2011


Side Show.
Thursday, August 19, 2004
3:52 AM

Why do people choose not to see whats right in front of their eyes? Is it like selective hearing? Or are they just believing what they want to? I suppose if it was like selective hearing it would have to be something that has been offered up time and time again and such repeated advances have become old and inconsequential. This then can be scratched off the list because no one has that many opportunities at this. And what motivates most peoples choices anyways? Are we all really self interested all the time? I took an intro to Philosophy course this last spring quarter and one of the main problems I had with the class was that each different philosopher was trying to classify everyone under one title. I don't think its fare to say that all of our actions are motivated by one or a few factors over and over. I truly believe that people have the ability to act selflessly. But back to the choosing not to see evident thing...sometimes I wonder if people do see these things but are afraid to act on them because they are so unsure of themselves. Even as I write this Im not sure of the terminology when dealing with "titles" given by philosophers. Should I be saying "schools of thought" instead? Normally something as trivial as this would stop me from publishing this blog entry because of the fear of inaccuracy. If anything I don't want people to think less of me because of my ability, or lack there of, to string together coherent thoughts. But fuck it. How am I to ever learn anything when I cant even take a chance to be wrong. Being incorrect is a fear of mine. I think its perfectly normal. So, I still cant answer my own questions fully. People have to see whats in front of them eventually. Maybe some realize it to late. Maybe they don't want what they see, or, they are afraid of embracing it. Maybe they are interpreting what they see wrongly. I guess that they could be missing it. Some people have such an unbelievable pace to their lives, they could be pasting right by something special and not even know it. But, when it comes down to it, in the first place, maybe whats there, they didn't ask for, didn't want and don't want to see because it scares them. They might not be ready for it. Or, they might not care to take advantage of it. I guess my point is that things out in the open, clear things that need and want to be taken advantage of wont be there forever. Things, feelings, events and circumstances will change and what once was will cease to exist. I don't want that to happen. Its being offered and ignored at the same time. But, sadly it wont be reevaluated and it will vanish in time.
0 comments